Charlierific Bear

loving the sweet sensation brought about by choc-choc bars. . .

7.30.2006

O Men!

Inherently, men are predisposed to conter fleurette, a French term equivalent to flirting. In more precise terms, flirting means “to speak sweet nothings”.

A form of interaction…

Flirting consists of different gestures and body language, suggesting a sexual or romantic interest for another person. Customarily, flirting is done simply for immediate entertainment with no intention of developing any further relationship. Such type of “flirting” sometimes faces deprecation from others, as it is misconstrued to be more serious, or perceived as a form of "cheating" (considering that the person is already in a romantic relationship with someone else). However, some people would ardently disprove this claim (or should I say fact) by confirming that: "started out right, flirting could actually lead to long-term relationships". Really now? *thinking, doubting*

FLIRT101 in progress…

Interestingly, both sexes seemed to have mastered the course FLIRT101 through practice. lol. :p Hence, find this mischievous yet spine-tingling venture rewarding. Take note, some of them would even admit and swank that such activity heightens their self worth. Are they that conceited to say so? Whatever…


Me on FLIRTING…

In my own point of view, flirting regardless of its “benefits” should be passed up. Why? First, it could injure a newly established relationship (relationships-at-work). Men, apart from being flirt, are weak beings (do you agree? lol.). They easily give in to temptations so better get off them if you do not intend to be a reason for separation. And please, please don’t allow yourself to be because you wouldn’t be happy either. Just remember that if he managed to leave a girl because of you, the chance of you being left because of another girl is much more plausible; and lastly it usually results to a relationship that is primarily based on sex. You wouldn’t want to be considered a fubu, would you? I know I’m already sounding hypocrite but I am just stating a fact. Sad to say, most flirty people really end up in these types of relationships.

Final words...

A woman who wants respect should demand for it, and prove that she’s worth it. You do not need to level yourself down to get the man of you dreams, simplicity is still the catch. I firmly believe that lasting relationships root from trust and not from lust.

*for editing

7.26.2006

tO bE oR nOt tO bE...

Honesty is the fundamental basis of all our dealings, whether it is with relatives, friends, or even with strangers. It is the only thread that is preventing the fabric of civilization from falling apart. Along with fidelity, this virtue makes every relationship sturdy and irrevocable. However, this isn’t something that people opt and manage to keep. Why? For certain reasons; it is either they’re too apprehensive to lose something or someone, or they simply enjoy the thrill of keeping a secret; or it could also be they’re just pressured to lie. We really don’t know.

Honesty in a relationship further establishes trust. For me, this five letter word virtue means a lot. And when I say a lot I mean it 100% (get it? *wink*). Trust for me is a social good that is to be protected as much as the air we breathe and the water we drink. Shortage of which (even a .01%) would greatly affect the bond one is trying to keep. A centimeter or even a millimeter minus in your pride line wouldn’t hurt, would it? I mean, you wouldn’t be losing that much by being truthful and committed. Remember, people would respect you more, and would be more trusting of you, if you have this courage to tell the truth.

Cheating is a no-no for me because I know how it feels to be betrayed, fooled, and be left. It may not come out now or not even soon, but eventually the good side of you will bug you with regret. And when this happens, it’s already too late for you to get back. You would forever be stuck in the black hole, grouching over something you had idled away. Bwahahaha! Good luck!

Truly, there is enough for man’s need but not enough for man’s greed. ^_^

7.15.2006

UnLeAsHeD

In the battle of life, the worst enemy a man could have is probably himself; specifically, the fear he has instilled in his mind and in his heart. Being a threat to ones peaceful living, this self-made fear, once conquered, can actually liberate a thousand souls.

FEARs (False Evidence Appearing Real) come in different forms and intensity. Some fears feel much stronger than the others to the point where it stops us in our tracks. I'm pretty sure all of us have been victims of this so-called "fear", which we are ourselves have created. Thus, it is us and only us, who can vanquish this triple-eyed monster thingy.LOL

Just this morning, I was able to free myself from anxiety by setting out a truth I have long been keeping (6 months to be exact), and believe me this is so relieving. It led me to a thousand places...to Neverland, to the deep seas (my sanctuary, oh i just love the waters!c;), and to the heavens. The feeling is simply inexplicable. ^_^

Indeed, life is full of complexities. But no matter how twisted our lives can get, we can make and live it simpler by being "thinking" and "doing" beings.

7.04.2006

eDuCaTiOn @ iTs fiNeSt

Due to technological advancements, a major shift from a teacher-directed learning to a learner-centered learning has emerged (Howard, 2003). In the recent years, teachers were regarded as masters of the classroom. They were the ones giving all the input to the students, without putting much emphasis on the process. Henceforth, the student becomes dependent on what is being taught.

The recent developments in technology have brought forth an online library for students to browse through. The availability of the aforecited library brings forth a fountain of information sources that the students may look into and if the teachers fail to remain in pace with recent developments, should begin to fear for his/her ineffectiveness. What is there to teach if the teachers are behind what the students have researched? And thus, pursuing the scheme of a teacher-centered education is no longer effective because the teacher must continue their education as well by visiting the internet from time to time for updates.

For reasons that learning development is a dynamic process and remain side by side with the continually changing demands of the time, the teacher must progress dynamically as well to avoid becoming laughing-stocks of the students in times of failure to deliver the subject matter in relevance to the recent changes.

A facilitator is defined as somebody who aids or assists in a process, especially by encouraging people to find their own solutions to problems or tasks. The moderator on the other hand presides over discussions on a specific topic. As teacher-facilitator-moderator, an instructor must be ready with various recently published solutions and be able to encourage the use of all methods if possible. As it is said that by education, a man becomes a jack-of-all-trades, master of one. He/she must be able to encourage students to participate in discussions and share personal ideas.

Overall, as we have applied too much focus on curriculum development, along with this vision we must struggle to improve the abilities and continue to educate our teachers to enable them to act the part they are going to play. Curricula must be developed in pace with the times. Teachers must be developed as well to be able to deliver the objectives in the said curricula.

tRuSt vS. miStRuSt

Trust means enabling other people to take advantage of your vulnerabilities—but expecting that they will not do it. Err…how positive could this be?! Haha! ^_^ Simple as it may seem, trust isn’t something easy to give away 100%. Well, considering the possibilities of getting hurt and being betrayed, who would attempt to risk? However, it is also said that trust is imperative in every relationship as it gives two people the confidence and assurance that they’re being loved. People believe that if there’s no trust, there’s no love. How true could this be?

Trust, for me, is something earned. It’s something that one has to work for. You don’t just trust someone you just knew right? [Certainly. c:] But what about those you know personally, do you trust them completely? [Nah, uh. Maybe.] See, that’s the complexity of the matter. Trust is necessary yet it’s hard to confer. Sustaining someone’s trust is another thing. It’s like maintaining ones blood pressure; keeping it normal and stable. Once you go beyond 140/90 mm Hg, you’re in great peril. Thus, you have to make certain that you keep everything in moderation. A famous quote states: “Relationships-of all kinds-are like sand held in your hand. Held loosely, with an open hand, the sand remains where it is. The minute you close your hand and squeeze tightly to hold on, the sand trickles through your fingers. You may hold onto some of it, but most will be spilled. A relationship is like that. Held loosely, with respect and freedom for the other person, it is likely to remain intact. But hold too tightly, too possessively, and the relationship slips away and is lost.” The above stated quote underscores the value of trust in a relationship. If both parties keep doubting each other (which implies a lack of trust), then most likely they’d end up in dispute. The often this cycle recurs, the chances of breaking up upsurges.

Trust is when you expose your vulnerabilities to people, believing they will not take advantage of your openness. Yet it has limits. Trusting doesn’t mean disregarding the truth seen with both eyes. Instead, it means taking facts as is, setting aside the past or whatever biases you may associate with it. =) Both (gaining ones trust and keeping it) are hard to do but it’s definitely worth every ounce of sweat!